The UFO Movie THEY Don't Want You to See (2023)

This plays like something made for TV in the 1980s.. LOL

if there is life or not outside earth is less interesting than our own llife imao …..to know myself and my species
is the real science….our history is the real mystery…..our ideas in astrofysics are proven wrong by every discovery , forget about
a big bang its misinterpreted observation that lead to this fantasy….its all wrong , how can we expect other life to be of
any interest if it is found on planets too far away. to visit ? our physics must be wrong if we are visited is the conclusion

Nobody knows shit

There's always going to be debunkers and people that don't believe in UFOs. The only problem with that is for the people that actually have had the experience. One thing that these debunkers will never do is take every mufon member and others that have seen them and debunk the person that was abducted. I remember when I was 5 years old and an entity appeared in front of me. After it cursed me it vanished. When I tell people these days ( I'm 65 ) they look at me like I'm lying or crazy. It's easy to surround yourself with people that are debunkers like this guy does and make a video because actual people that have had a paranormal experience can't tell him about what happened to them. He should listen to the Navajo Ranger stories, skinwalker ranch stories etc. Here in Canada there's famous cases like the Saskatchewan farmer Edwin Fuhr, the Falcon Lake, Manitoba, Shag Harbor, Nova Scotia and Fox Lake, Yukon stories that involve multiple people, involved the Federal RCMP, US army, and are documented by the university of Manitoba and CBC. The ex police officer in the UK Allen Godfrey, Travis Walton and many other people have told their stories and I believe them just because of the experiences I have had throughout my life. After that experience I had at 5 years old I would be in my bed but hear voices telling me to come fly with them. My body would spasm like I was falling and I would wake up. One night when they told me to come fly with them I asked them "If I come fly with you how will I come back down" They replied "When you come fly with us you will never have to go back down" I do remember and nobody can tell me any different!

This video smells like they trying to cover up something!!! Sad how you gonna say all these professional people that reported these things are lying! Hhhmmmmm no good!! Bad video!

Rational & intelligent.
I really want to believe & I have many arguments for et life but reality is a must.

WOW! GREAT MOVIE! After studying UFOS for the last 7 years and being a “believer,” I could have only wished I saw this film earlier in my research career.-Unemployed

It amazes me that some people still will not except that we are not the only intelligent life in the universe (let alone our own galaxy) 50 years ago “we” thought that our solar system was unique no other planets existed.
This documentary started off stating this fact! then went on to say how many “EXO planets” have been found through the advent of new technology. and there are probably lots of intelligent life forms out there. but we would never meet “them” because of the vast distances involved. Really?? our solar system is very young compared to rest of our galaxy, so surely older civilisations would be far more advanced than we are!maybe millions of years ahead in technology. so what makes people think that finding away of crossing these distances and boundaries wouldn’t have be conquered by now. we ourselves have theorised that space and time can be “warped” through a creation of a “wormhole “ Albert Einstein called it the “Rosen bridge” and that theory hasn’t been disproved so that was 70+ years ago! move forward a 1000years from now( if we are still here??😌) what do you think our technology will be like. It’s time mankind opened its eyes and stopped living in the “darkness” and embrace the new frontiers that lie ahead. 😞

You canny change the laws of physics Jim …. BUT YOU CAN critique the entire physics community!

Stagnation in Theoretical Physics:

Theoretical physics has experienced limited progress over the past few decades, particularly in efforts to unify quantum mechanics with general relativity. While advancements in technology and experimental physics have pushed the boundaries of our understanding, the theoretical side has largely remained focused on models that have yet to produce significant empirical breakthroughs. Notably, string theory has dominated the field since the 1980s, yet it has not led to the experimental evidence required to confirm its claims. This prolonged focus on unverified models has contributed to a sense of stagnation, as fundamental questions about the nature of the universe remain unresolved.

Institutional Inertia and Resistance to New Ideas:

The academic and funding structures that govern the physics community have become increasingly conservative, prioritizing established ideas over bold, innovative approaches. Young scientists are incentivized to align with mainstream research agendas rather than exploring unconventional theories, which stifles intellectual diversity and discourages risk-taking. This institutional inertia prevents the exploration of alternative frameworks that could potentially solve long-standing problems, as the system tends to reject or ignore ideas that challenge dominant paradigms.

Lack of Accountability in Theoretical Models:

One of the core issues in modern theoretical physics is the lack of accountability for ideas that fail to produce verifiable results. Despite the absence of experimental validation, theories like string theory continue to receive attention and funding. This persistence of untested models undermines the scientific process by allowing speculation to dominate without the rigor of empirical confirmation. The continued focus on these models detracts from the development of alternative approaches that could yield more concrete progress.

The “Hidden College” and Intellectual Underground:

There exists an informal network of scientists and thinkers, often referred to as a “hidden college,” who operate outside traditional academic settings. These individuals pursue unconventional ideas not supported by mainstream academia, which tends to prioritize safe, established research over radical innovation. This intellectual underground may harbor the next generation of breakthroughs, as its members explore theories that challenge current orthodoxies. The existence of such a network highlights the limitations of the academic system in supporting truly diverse intellectual inquiry.

Breakaway “Black Project” Physics:

There is speculation that some advanced discoveries in physics may have been sequestered into classified or “black” projects, possibly within military or government sectors. These projects remain outside the scope of public scientific discourse, potentially leading to technological advancements that are not shared with the broader scientific community. The existence of such breakaway research programs raises the possibility that key breakthroughs in fields like energy, propulsion, or quantum mechanics have already occurred but remain classified. This secrecy creates a divide between public scientific knowledge and hidden advancements.

Groupthink and the Perils of Intellectual Monoculture:

The dominance of certain theories, such as string theory, has created an intellectual monoculture within the physics community. This groupthink stifles creativity and prevents the field from exploring new ideas that could lead to breakthroughs. While specialization is necessary for scientific progress, marginalizing alternative frameworks is counterproductive. New theories, even if unconventional, deserve rigorous exploration instead of being prematurely dismissed. The current culture of intellectual conformity limits the possibility of discovering new principles that could move the field forward.

The Danger of DEI Quotas in Intellectual Fields:

In addition to these issues, the growing influence of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives introduces a new challenge by prioritizing identity factors—such as race, gender, or ethnicity—over qualifications. This undermines the very essence of meritocracy. When individuals are elevated based on immutable characteristics rather than their intellectual contributions, it dilutes the quality of work in fields that rely on rigor and expertise, like physics. DEI quotas often result in placing unqualified people in positions of influence, which slows progress and stifles genuine diversity of thought.

This approach to diversity is, in fact, anti-diversity. By focusing on superficial factors like skin color or gender, it reduces the space for diverse ideas and independent thinkers, replacing intellectual diversity with demographic tokenism. This practice is not only counterproductive, but it also represents a form of discrimination and racism, prioritizing appearance over substance. Such quotas return society to a place of bigotry, where people are judged by their intrinsic characteristics rather than their ideas and capabilities. This divisive approach threatens the integrity of scientific progress and should not be supported.

A Call for True Intellectual Diversity and Innovation:

To revitalize theoretical physics, there must be a focus on fostering true intellectual diversity, encouraging bold, innovative ideas based on merit and qualifications. The academic system should support unconventional approaches that challenge existing paradigms, rather than limiting progress through intellectual conformity or identity quotas. Only by promoting a diversity of perspectives and ideas, without reducing individuals to superficial traits, can physics make the leaps necessary to solve fundamental questions about the universe. This requires a shift away from rigid institutional thinking and toward a culture that values merit, rigor, and genuine creativity.

So you can’t really say we can’t go faster than light. What you can say is what happens when you try to do that which I think was described very badly in this video. I don’t think that woman has an adequate understanding of relativity to make the comment she’s making she is after all an astrophysicist, not an expert in relativistic physics.

So what you can say is that from everything that’s known it doesn’t seem possible, but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t something that could change or it’s not about the laws. After all it’s about how are you apply them.

There are immutable rules to how the game of cricket is played for instance; the gap between the best player and the worst would make it seem to anyone unfamiliar with the game as if the best and worst professional players were playing by completely different rules despite rigourous standards!

Most of the people you’ve interviewed in this documentary are at the very low end— no offence to them, but I wouldn’t take their word for anything given their conformist adherence to the slavish status quo mainstream establishment view of relativistic physics.

The data shows what the data shows, but to extrapolate that out to try to make broader statements like you can’t travel faster than light isn’t it self a scientific statement!

You should do this whole documentary again, but this time interview the alternative physics community. These are people with real qualifications, and that way you can genuinely say that it’s unbiased!

No Whitehouse lawn landing… but several days flying around D.C. and what about the ghost I came face to face with and vanished while I was taking to him… sealed work location..

so you're telling us that all ufo sightings are not real???.

100 % agree

We are nothing

I almost lost faith. Since we're zero civilization in the Kardashian scale imaginative civilization three times that. We will not be able to see them but you did not talk about that. And basically I think this information is pretty much a diversion from the fact that there is a propulsion system faster than light explain the Einsteins theory of everything turn off special relativity look it up that it is possible to move faster than light and many more times my folding space just because we don't understand it does it mean that this universe hasn't created it I find it a little pessimistic in the explanation of that man with his computer seem to be misinforming. Annoying that a man that has all the answers to me is not genuine. Quit while you're ahead because they're a lot of sightings and tangible proof put the of course the top secret. And I don't think you have the pay grade or the clearance to obtain the real information as the speaker you're a great guy.

This guy just contradicted himself, he believes when scientist say you can't travel at the speed of light when scientist have never done it and don't know if some other aliens can do it, scientist what happens if you travel at the speed of light but they aren't sure cause they haven't done it, so scientist don't have physical evidence like he says 3 minutes later, don't believe unless there is physical evidence?? So don't believe the scientist that's only guessing in his interviews?? Guess scientist and this guy aren't that smart at all lmao

I'm pretty sure that we have a theory know about warping space time , we just have not the tech or power or know to do it , and yes it is theory, but so was the speed of sound, light etc, so this program just shows us what we do not know and not what we do know .

I think it's interesting. I wish the items left out of the video due to classification could be made to be strategically neutral so we could add that in to the equation. The instrument recreating is horribly misleading. If done in good faith thank you for improving the science of validation. You presentation however is no more compelling than anything else available. Just sounds like a more intellectual version of I think because I feel, and I must be right because I do this thing and I used it to disprove it. This is going to make the tinfoil hats cry misinformation. Sigh.

This sure seems like it was probably funded by the CIA

So this is an other one, telling us his story, telling us his true… his massage: go to work live your life and believe in god couz there are no Aliens out there…. just another storyteller…

I agree with Brian regarding the probability that we have been visited by aliens. The distances are too vast and travel time too lengthy. The technological hurdles are too great.

Brian claims extraordinary evidence is required:
29:14
“and where we must present extraordinary evidence. To prove something that's truly unprecedented,”

but that is false and unscientific. Only evidence is required.