The Earth Is Growing Conspiracy – DEBUNKED

The KNEE-JERK PANGEA THEORY hoodie and tee are available NOW! Show the world that you are part of the CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE! Link is in the description. Only available till Oct. 1st. So get em while the getting is good.

MORE or less the Earth has shrinked a bit when the Moon got formed because of a huge asteroid hitting us. Not a lot, but still. But growing? 🤣🤣🤣

5:48 Not quite. Matter, and even mass, can be created or destroyed, for instance in a nuclear reaction. What is indeed conserved is energy, which can take the form of matter.

I think it's all bullcrap. The people of the future will look back and laugh at us, and the people after them will do the same. The only thing we know for sure is that we don't know anything.

My question to to this person would be where's the mass coming from? if the earth is growing where is it getting the extra mass to achieve growth.

as an unemployed student with no qualifications if theres was no ocean early on then there were no fishi where did every creature ever come from if there were no fishi

Wouldn't an expanding planet mean that we would get pushed out of the atmosphere some day?

Wow, that's actually one I haven't heard before.
Coming from the bottom of the North Island of New Zealand you can imagine how surprised I was to hear there is no subduction and not plate tectonics.

If he says it's fake it's probably true because he's gay

I wish our planet was growing and gaining mass, more land, more resources, nigh infinite potential
But alas, it's just a flight of fancy

The Law of conservation of mass alone disproves this

Would never have guessed that one of the most important comic book artists of all time was also a loon

i didnt even know this was a thing, it was some idea i threw out in 4D expansion, that explains why down is down, i call it translation theory, because at the centre of mass you translate at the same rate as any massive object, would be weird if you could time travel back 65 million years with your current time dilation in spacetime, it would all seem smaller to you. Would be funny if you went back and a Dinosaur was chicken sized to you. This is what the big bang model says is possible tho..

The whole universe expands in the 4th dimension. Do you understand the big bang? The bubble either inflates, or it doesnt, but it seems like it does

Now if you take Einstein and Minkowski’s approach and make a time cone out of the universe, you see how it is expanding, cut the cone in half by volume and its only 20% smaller, any slice across the horizon is going to be an orbit. In Non Euclidean space an orbit of the big bang, and observable universe take the same time.

I unite Einstein, Minkowski and Euclid, and can show how straight lines in space are curved by the 4th dimension. Mapping space in 3D it is conical, Not spherical, I even unite Flat Earth to the mix, placing the universe at the centre of a black hole, it explains how and why it expands, bringing Hawking into the mix. Uniting everyone into one theory I can explain orbital mechanics, the big bang that never happened, and why the universe expands without needing dark energy to fudge my numbers.

As the singularity evaporates it inflates, everything with mass fills the void at the same scale, it always seems 13 billion years to a big bang or 46 billion light years to the CMB, they are the same event, they are the big bangs ice wall, you cant see past it because the map of the observable universe and the Gleason map, need to follow the observer to be useful.

Flat Earth and the Big Bang are both at odds with what happens when the math stops mathing. I can show, that if you make a 3D map of the universe you can cut the cone across the horizon as small as you like, scale it and it always looks like the same cone. Orbital mechanics are the true constant in the universe. If it truly was inflating then stars would expand and swallow their solar systems. Orbits would decay so fast. Everything seems to be expanding but as everything expands at the same rate, nothing actually moves, you can see the change over time as light is massless, it doesnt need to conform, but even empty space has mass and energy. It all scales in time.

If you cancel your orbital velocity around the earth, you fall to its core, delete the planet and you take the same path it does in spacetime, cancel out your velocity to the sun and do the same, you take its path, cancel out the relative velocity of every star and galaxy, which way do you fall?? Do you fall to the big bang, is the only direction left to travel, which way is down at this point? Time ticks forward. different for every observer, depending how much space is distorted. Time dilation is Non Euclidean space, its the same thing. 13 billion years ago a second for you would be like 13 billion years now..

Every time you cancelled out your momentum you fell in a straight path to the next nearest massive object, but from another perspective its a curved path. It is Non Euclidean in nature, when you see curve in the planet, its actually the curve in the 4th dimension you are seeing, you know oceans flatten out, flat.. but you cant rationalise curved space without curved lines.

If we had a bridge from LA to Dubai, flat in time, its parallel to the ocean, it curves around the planet. It is flat geometry as space and time allow. If you had a glass factory making a 1mm thick glass rod that extended onto the bridge via V shaped spinning rollers, supported every 30cm or so, how far can the rod be extended without breaking? it should be able to wrap right around the planet, and still roll laterally, it curved with time but its flat in spacetime.

If you had a bit of H bar going from the north to south pole, you know those heavy duty iron girders that are H or I shaped, what happens if you flip it over, do both ends rise up into space? think about the logic there, it was supported equally along the bridge, its weight distributed the same, now all of a sudden you think its plastically deformed and both ends lift into space, now it all balances on a single point in the middle of the bar.

Our minds dont run on such big scales but it is flat on the horizon. If you drill from A to B as the samdworm swims, its not a straight line in space or time, mapped on a 3D cone of potential it shows both ends is like jumping into a pit, it flattens and ends in a climb, the flattest route is the horizon, i bet if you flatten my cone out for density, it shows that coring thru the planet isnt even the shortest route in spacetime

Space and time scale

A line flat in time is flat in spacetime, if you have mass.. Massless light doesnt do orbits, if it did most of the world would argue that it was flat, but what is flat in a curved universe. its all just a bubble of information, racing through a higher dimension, the big bang model is like a record playing infinitely, but before there is infinite void of nothing, and after will be an infinite quietness, how big is the record, is the void of nothing as irrelevant as the infinite something that is the universe.

As an IT Expert, I'm pretty sure there's no stretchy internet cables connecting Europe and America. If the earth were expanding exponentially, they'd be unreliable or broken by now, even if the Russians didn't get to them yet.

To be fair, the Earth must have grown sometime. Planetary accretion is the generally accepted theory of how planets and stars form.
Obviously this is very different from the process this guy is describing but still, at some stage the Earth must have been growing bigger.

Ok fed