![Phone Holders for Your Car [Adjustable Gooseneck] Dashboard Windshield Phone Mount…](https://techcratic.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/81Jm1f5lmML._AC_SL1500_-360x180.jpg)
![JOYROOM for MagSafe Car Mount Charger, [All-Metal] 15W Fast MagSafe Car Charger, Hands…](https://techcratic.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/81xRTDAFnGL._AC_SL1500_-360x180.jpg)
Get ready for out-of-this-world fun with the UFO Cow Abduction: Beam Up Your Bovine, the hilarious and quirky game that lets you “beam up” cows in your own UFO!
With over 6,809 ratings and a 4.5-star average, it’s clear that players are loving the fun and challenge this game brings. A hit with over 5,000 units sold just last month, you can grab your own copy for only $11.39 on Amazon! Whether you’re looking to add a little whimsy to your gaming collection or want a great gift for friends and family, this game delivers non-stop fun. Order now for just $11.39 at Amazon!
Support Techcratic
If you find value in Techcratic’s insights and articles, consider supporting us with Bitcoin. Your support helps me, as a solo operator, continue delivering high-quality content while managing all the technical aspects, from server maintenance to blog writing, future updates, and improvements. Support Innovation! Thank you.
Bitcoin Address:
bc1qlszw7elx2qahjwvaryh0tkgg8y68enw30gpvge
Please verify this address before sending funds.
Bitcoin QR Code
Simply scan the QR code below to support Techcratic.
Please read the Privacy and Security Disclaimer on how Techcratic handles your support.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate, Techcratic may earn from qualifying purchases.
I agree, I think this is a reflection, the photo survives but the witness's don't? This guy in the video is spot on, I mean he knows his diamond shapes his jumper says it all…😅 🛸
That's some clever shit Monkey, but im not totally convinced of your hypothesis sorry!!!
How much did you get paid to do this shoddy debunk?
Most debunkers are full of crap anyway. Look at the totality of evidence: reliable (many highly trained and educated pilots and military personnel) eye witness accounts, photographs and videos and physical evidence. The United States government actually releasing the recent 2017 videos essentially admitting we have evidence and congressional hearings that have provided even more credible witnesses through the whistle blower act. If you don't believe any of this now, you are clearly delusional, an idiot or a governmental disinformation agent. And yes the government does pay people to pass disinformation and "disprove/debunk" the ufo/uap subject to sow seeds of doubt and misunderstanding. If the shoe fits wear it TheSneezingMonkey.
I am a skeptic. No personal vested interest in whether this is a real or fake photograph. But you never mention or consider that the photographer could have been lying on the ground while taking the photo. The “A” vs “V” shape is moot when talking about this kind of very imperfectly laid farm fencing, where the fence posts can extend from the ground at a variety of angles. I’m sorry but this is a very incomplete attempt at definitively debunking this photo. That being said, a better question would be why is the identity of the hikers unknown? They are said to have worked at a local hotel and “disappeared”. No one knew their names? Unlikely.
Fog? Its Scotland.
You should do an update video. Far clearer photos have been released.
It's been suggested that it's a photo of a small island on Loch Etive, about 100 miles from Calvine.
Here are the coordinates: 56.466590, -5.326675
It's a pretty close match, if you ask me. There's some small trees on the island, but they may not have been there 30+ years ago.
This shit fire on mute
Acredito que seja algo militar, tipo o caso do Black bird.
I believe it was Nick Pope, a former Brit. MOD employee who said he was very impressed with this image and had a copy blown up for his office. Not that that really means anything, but he presents as a sensible methodical man like you, Impressive in your own right. Nice Job and pardon the anglaise ~ M
Why would someone go thru the trouble to make a fake picture out out to the public and then disappear and refuse to speak about it or do any type of interviews, get no type of reward for this at all doesn’t make sense
I don’t agree with your analysis. You would have to go to the location to see if you could get the right perspective. However I still think the picture is not evidence of anything but a hoax.
there is a negative of this the photo is Real but its no UFO its most likey a target dummy. i dont understand wtf you are talking debunking the image, this is a target dummy that gets draged after a plane.
To me it looks like an island of some sort and a guy in a rowboat lol
The saucer is symmetrically, the jet isn't.
I don't think it's beyond reasonable that they managed to photography the object parallel to it's edge.
They're not taking the photo from sea level, they're on a hill.
I don't think this is a UFO at all. I don't know if it's a reflection of a rock, but I suspect that's what it is. If I wanted to pick apart your analysis, I would say the following.
1. It's not perfectly symmetric. It's mostly symmetric but there are a number of deviations in the coloration. A mirror image would show dark and light parts in a mirrored, which this doesn't.
2. Just because you can see the landscape on a clear day, doesn't mean you can see it on a foggy day. If these objects were in front of a bank of clouds, that would obscure the background.
3. You make a good point that this UFO couldn't be in level flight due to the angle of observation. So it's just flying at a tilt to the the camera. What is wrong with that? The "airplane" object isn't in level flight either. Things that fly are rarely in perfect flat orientation. I think this is actually two objects in water, one for the UFO and the other for the plane.
The mental gymnastics of this guy are hilarious. In the Costa Rica ufo video he claims the researchers were not credible as they weren’t photographers even though Vallee is one of the most intelligent people out there. In this video he then provides evidence that an actual expert on imagery claims the photo is real but he still disgards them.
Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence of 👽🛸, I would totally agree with you 👍
And the picture you show has terrible resolution which clearly distorts the harrier jump jet in other better pictures
The photo was taken on the Isle of Skye on the west coast and I don’t know if it’s called the Calvine photo because of the place or the surname of the person who took it and being Scottish I can assure you that Calvine is a surname
clearly not a reflection in that river. also if its a reflection it should have a mirror image no? the bottom isn't the same shape as the top? i wander why they released this photo that can obviously be interpreted many ways and classified the other 5 pictures another 50 years? all the experts that have analyzed this photo must have just done a bunch of guestimates like this video? obviously just not as accurate guesses as this video. classifying stuff in bulks? okay man be-bunked good job.
So man knows that "England has a lot of mist on water" but doesn't know that majority of rickety old fence posts in the middle of literally nowhere aren't going to be perfectly straight. Also you're assuming the photo is taken parallel to the fence which may not be the case at all.
i always thought the jet was actually a rowboat in the water
aperture?
Or the photographer kneeled when he took the photo to get that angle, but I agree it could be a reflection.
I think this is a very good theory about water reflection. However I'm not sold on the fence theory. You're assuming the fence posts were exactly straight. It could have been an old fence where some of the posts have subsided into an angle. I've seen this happen many times on fences, especialy on such uneven terrain.
In the witness description, I think they mentioned 2 RAF Harrier jump jets which can also hover. They said they circled around the unknown vehicle. So, supposedly the small aircraft in the image is a Harrier.
The strange craft itself looks a little different to me underneath, so not sure about reflection, but its not a detailed enough image to confirm.
Would be interestesting to know the camera and film used, and see if we could test out the water reflection theory though. Only thing is, if this is indeed a reflection why are the leaves and branches of the tree not reflecting in the water, and there does seem to be some sort of faint land at the very bottom of the Image.
The more I look at this, the more I do think something isn't quite right.
Could it be the terrain is covered in mist or fog laying low? Giving the illusion of no terrain? Lots of theories to think about here I guess.
Actually, when I look at this image, especially zoomed in, it looks to me like it was taken at a different location. What I see here is a downward-angled photo from a shoreline into the ocean. The UFO looks very much like the reflection of an island with a small mountain, maybe volcanic, out in the bay. The jet may have been there, but is also either just a reflection on the water, or not even a plane at all and it just looks like one, it might be a rock or something some distance out from the shoreline. I feel that I can even see the ripples of the water between fence and jet/UFO. But I'm surely no expert, that's my opinion which very much might be wrong.
If the cameras focus was set to take the UFO, the background would NOT be in focus. Also if it's fake, why have 50 years been added to the official release of any information? It's a UFO.
Can anyone hear the sound of straws of Little to no mass being grasped, events of this ilk happen to and have been for time before measure. Your looking in the wrong place with the wrong mental state to me your an intelligent observer with closed eyes in terms of interaction between you and your spacial environment and structure to which all that exist and observe are connected. I was in your shoes and I am aware of your internal machinations when faced with second hand evidence and that is why you will need first hand encountering