![[5-Yrs Free Data Recovery] GIGASTONE 256GB SD Card, 4K Camera Pro, A1 V30 SDXC Memory…](https://techcratic.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/51F2IcqgHrL._AC_SL1000_-360x180.jpg)
![for Tesla Model Y Juniper Dashboard Cover,[Anti-Glare and Dustproof] Suede Dashboard Pad…](https://techcratic.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/714WbdusZML._AC_SL1500_-360x180.jpg)
Get ready for out-of-this-world fun with the UFO Cow Abduction: Beam Up Your Bovine, the hilarious and quirky game that lets you “beam up” cows in your own UFO!
With over 6,809 ratings and a 4.5-star average, it’s clear that players are loving the fun and challenge this game brings. A hit with over 5,000 units sold just last month, you can grab your own copy for only $11.39 on Amazon! Whether you’re looking to add a little whimsy to your gaming collection or want a great gift for friends and family, this game delivers non-stop fun. Order now for just $11.39 at Amazon!
Help Power Techcratic’s Future – Scan To Support
If Techcratic’s content and insights have helped you, consider giving back by supporting the platform with crypto. Every contribution makes a difference, whether it’s for high-quality content, server maintenance, or future updates. Techcratic is constantly evolving, and your support helps drive that progress.
As a solo operator who wears all the hats, creating content, managing the tech, and running the site, your support allows me to stay focused on delivering valuable resources. Your support keeps everything running smoothly and enables me to continue creating the content you love. I’m deeply grateful for your support, it truly means the world to me! Thank you!
|
BITCOIN
bc1qlszw7elx2qahjwvaryh0tkgg8y68enw30gpvge Scan the QR code with your crypto wallet app |
|
DOGECOIN
D64GwvvYQxFXYyan3oQCrmWfidf6T3JpBA Scan the QR code with your crypto wallet app |
|
ETHEREUM
0xe9BC980DF3d985730dA827996B43E4A62CCBAA7a Scan the QR code with your crypto wallet app |
Please read the Privacy and Security Disclaimer on how Techcratic handles your support.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate, Techcratic may earn from qualifying purchases.
I'm glad you mentioned ships and buoyancy because we can go back in history and look at deadweight tonnage of cargo/military ships across the past 2000 years and notice how wooden ships carrying capacity for the largest ships was pretty similar for at least 1800 years until ironclads became a thing. We have the Roman Isis ship with 1200 tons weight capacity 2nd century AD, we have Chinese treasure ships with 1200-2000 tons capacity, and the average cargo ships had 100-500 tons capacity across the ages before ironclads.
We know ancient Egyptians were excellent sailors, traversing around all of Africa on ships. So for them, building a ship capable of carrying an 80 ton stone would be ridiculously easy. Transporting the stones from Aswan to Giza is literally the easiest thing to explain, and yet those people keep talking about it like it's some mystery that cannot be explained.
Survivorship bias is something to be very wary of when looking at history, and especially in archeology, what you see is strictly what was able to survive time, what failed to survive is long lost. Those structures are found because they survived, and we don't get to see the majority of structures of those times because they were all destroyed due to time. What survivorship bias cannot tell you is how much trial and error took place to reach that point, and it does not paint a timeline of events because of that.
Think of it in a different way, when we write a software program we do a lot of prototypes before we can remotely think of the final product, the prototypes change constantly and none of them survive to the production programs. Snippets of those prototypes can survive because they were dead-on correct when written and the best way or writing code. If you had two engineering teams from across the world who never communicated but had to design programs for similar purposes and using the same tools, they are very likely to end up with several similarities between them. It's a process where independent groups reach the same conclusion, which is often widely accepted as evidence that the conclusion they reached is most likely the best one.
There is a reason everyone is doing the same thing independent of one another, it is the best way to do it under the provided parameters. It isn't rocket science. But even if it were rocket science, the rocket technology is evolving in several places independent of one another, and they too tend to reach similar conclusions on the best methods to develop rockets.
I believe that if he made more videos like that first one about "we are stardust" he would eventually have even more views
I like seeing Milo go Googldybunkers.
It’s so hilariously stupid how these cultures (mostly) recorded exactly how they did these things and all of these conspiracies just gloss over it because they know it absolutely obliterates their argument. Some of the only technology that they knew and we don’t are Greek fire and the Romans used better concrete
I tried to put a one ton uncut rock on a sled and it broke
Clearly the Egyptians used LaSEr cuT BlOCks And sOlVed GraVIty tO LevITatE tHe StoNEs
10:30 as a 6 year old I carved into granite with a nail, so im sure a large buff mason could do it with actual tools
E Pluribus GOOGLEDEBUNKERS
31:55 Where the fuck is my homesteading channel
Well, the Smithsonian must have disappeared and covered him up
17:00 a man cut through a mountain to make a path because his wife died going through that mountain in India so, no doubt people cut all the stones and made pyramids.
Gonna be honest, the abendoned granite stone is is actually evidence against the lasers. He says that if they cut it the way that archeologists say they did (with sand? My brain is throwing out information like it's an Olympic sport sorry), they'd have noticed the inconsistency so much earlier. But actually, no. They wouldn't have noticed it until it was visible with the human eye. Or… something. Now that I put it down I realize I may be completely wrong. Anyways, that argument just… dowsn't stand no matter what. And I'm just using a glitchy brain to see that
I laughed so hard I cried when bro threw up comically large knife as proof
Ah yes a power plant hhm… a power plant THAT POWERS WHAT EXACTLY
31:55 191k likes later, i guess milo now must start 19 homesteading channels
Hilarious that he thinks diamond tipped saws are the fastest way to cut stone. Motorized rope saws cut everything, bandsaws are amazing, high pressure water jets tend to cut fast and precise. We could build an amazing pyramid very easily with much harder stone. Lifting it also wouldn't be an issue.
13:16 oh my god my theory (about a different ancient building) was something other archeologists also considered???
Milo, my good man… Where's the homesteading channel?
Between the two parts, over 3 hours of yapping about Filip's dumb videos has to have been EXHAUSTING to make. Thank you for bringing this to us at the sacrifice of your sanity lol
pyramids are actually ancient (googledy) bunkers
1:34:54 Oooh Milo, Abby and Brittany Hensel entered the chat…! They are conjoined twins in Minnesota who each have a head, and half of a body, connected to each other. They share most internal organs, and control of their own hand and leg, but through a lifetime of practice, they can walk and type "two-handed" and drive, and they work as teachers. They're also very funny and seem like genuinely nice people.
it's crazy to me that people like this think that the pyramids were used as some like ridiculously powerful power plant and then everybody in egypt at the time they were built collectively agreed to shut their mouths about it and never talk about it again for, i don't know, sheer love of the game
That giant sloth skeleton had a tail. Why would a human giant have a fucking tail?
I’m still waiting on the homesteading channel
can we all collectively stop using the word "google" as a verb. Say search instead. Lets not give them free advertising, especially as their search engine is pretty terrible now
3:15 it would be more impressive if yuou could fit shit in there
Googledybunkers
34:39 this is like comparing a Nokia to an android and saying that one is a powerbank
bro help my mom makes me watch my lunch break its so dumb
The "modern technology" that Phillip suggests, could be a piece of string. If I use the same piece of pre measured string on all 4 sides on the base of a pyramid, believe it or not, im going to get 4 equal sides that just might be perfect, maybe even better than within 2 inches.
Obviously, this guy has no idea about how things are built.
5:48 THE FACTS OF SEXAY WOMAN 🫦💃💁♀️💅❤️🔥💋😝
(i think i will forever remember the pronunciation and name of this site hELLyea 🖤 also, can't believe this loser would mispronounce it and make it lose like 90% of the charm, not to mention accuracy, since he's never cared about that aspect of things… but it would've gone well with his innuendo jokes)