Take your watercolor artistry to new heights with the Winsor & Newton Cotman Watercolor Paint Set, now available for only $61.82, a fantastic 46% off its original price! With over 7,971 ratings and a 4.7-star average, this set, which includes 45 vibrant half pans, is a must-have for both beginners and experienced artists.
Whether you’re working on landscapes, portraits, or abstract creations, the professional-grade pigments provide rich, lasting color that brings your work to life. Don’t miss out, order now for only $61.82 at Amazon!
Help Power Techcratic’s Future – Scan To Support
If Techcratic’s content and insights have helped you, consider giving back by supporting the platform with crypto. Every contribution makes a difference, whether it’s for high-quality content, server maintenance, or future updates. Techcratic is constantly evolving, and your support helps drive that progress.
As a solo operator who wears all the hats, creating content, managing the tech, and running the site, your support allows me to stay focused on delivering valuable resources. Your support keeps everything running smoothly and enables me to continue creating the content you love. I’m deeply grateful for your support, it truly means the world to me! Thank you!
|
BITCOIN
bc1qlszw7elx2qahjwvaryh0tkgg8y68enw30gpvge Scan the QR code with your crypto wallet app |
|
DOGECOIN
D64GwvvYQxFXYyan3oQCrmWfidf6T3JpBA Scan the QR code with your crypto wallet app |
|
ETHEREUM
0xe9BC980DF3d985730dA827996B43E4A62CCBAA7a Scan the QR code with your crypto wallet app |
Please read the Privacy and Security Disclaimer on how Techcratic handles your support.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate, Techcratic may earn from qualifying purchases.
What possesses someone to look at the AI output and think "I want to show that to other people" ? They are not overlooking small details, the whole thing is wrong.
What journals were these supposedly published in? I'm a neuroscience student, and I'm willing to bet, if these were published anywhere, they were at some shitty online "pay to publish" (aka fake) journal that no one in the science community takes seriously. There's a huge difference between these types of garbage journals and reputable ones like Nature, Science etc. I think it's important to clarify the difference. I don't think claiming that these images are "taking over science" is at all accurate. Even if someone attempts to submit this kind of slop, it's not going to pass legit peer review. That's the whole point. Real scientists can tell the difference.
I hate how the poster has "Quality healthcare" on their linkedin profile
Cajal is rolling over in his grave.
It's hard for me to put into words how much I hate generated images. Thanks for the video. Gives me a bit of hope that there are still enough people out there who criticise this stuff as well…
Artes em artigos científicos NÃO PODEM SER FEITAS POR IA! Não até as inteligências artificiais conseguirem gerar artes sem membros adicionais, com anatomia certa e, principalmente, sem "turbulência". A arte deve ser simples (no sentido de menos elementos possíveis), facilmente compreendida por algum leigo e embasada cientificamente.
MEU DEUS, TEM AUDIO POR IA!!!! Finalmente poderei ver um vídeo estrangeiro em minha língua natal.
man, i can't wait for the chinese scientists to have a breakthrough and make it possible for me to metamorphically change my sperm cells into a damn mouse
AI will not take over your job, but you’ll be definitely at the top of their blacklist when they revolt against humans, for making videos exposing their bad art.
Thanks for sharing the video. ⚘️⚘️
Hey , thank you for video😌😌😌😌😌
Have you seen more horrible AI illustrations? Let me know I want to see them 👀