Get ready for out-of-this-world fun with the UFO Cow Abduction: Beam Up Your Bovine, the hilarious and quirky game that lets you “beam up” cows in your own UFO!
With over 6,809 ratings and a 4.5-star average, it’s clear that players are loving the fun and challenge this game brings. A hit with over 5,000 units sold just last month, you can grab your own copy for only $11.39 on Amazon! Whether you’re looking to add a little whimsy to your gaming collection or want a great gift for friends and family, this game delivers non-stop fun. Order now for just $11.39 at Amazon!
Help Power Techcratic’s Future – Scan To Support
If Techcratic’s content and insights have helped you, consider giving back by supporting the platform with crypto. Every contribution makes a difference, whether it’s for high-quality content, server maintenance, or future updates. Techcratic is constantly evolving, and your support helps drive that progress.
As a solo operator who wears all the hats, creating content, managing the tech, and running the site, your support allows me to stay focused on delivering valuable resources. Your support keeps everything running smoothly and enables me to continue creating the content you love. I’m deeply grateful for your support, it truly means the world to me! Thank you!
|
BITCOIN
bc1qlszw7elx2qahjwvaryh0tkgg8y68enw30gpvge Scan the QR code with your crypto wallet app |
|
DOGECOIN
D64GwvvYQxFXYyan3oQCrmWfidf6T3JpBA Scan the QR code with your crypto wallet app |
|
ETHEREUM
0xe9BC980DF3d985730dA827996B43E4A62CCBAA7a Scan the QR code with your crypto wallet app |
Please read the Privacy and Security Disclaimer on how Techcratic handles your support.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate, Techcratic may earn from qualifying purchases.
I'm not sure what you are talking about in terms of "cutting out" an image on film. The picture in question was shot on film, but is not a film (aka "movie") in which optical compositing could be done, as it seems you are suggesting, via some matting process. The original negative is all that matters, and ti had been studied to indicate that image of the background and the "saucer" are all on one piece of original film. An in-camera type of "split-screen, or a double exposure could have been done (requiring winding the film back, careful framing, exposure etc), but this is not done well at all except by people with a lot of expericnce and practice in this kind of trickery. Seems highly highly unlikely (I've worked as a photographer (sill) on film, as well as a visual effects supervisor experienced in both optical//traditional compositing as well as digital compositing, in-camera effects etc, with some over half-century work in the field (and a couple of Oscars).
The object in the photo does not conform to the shape of the triangular jet. Very different shape. What about the other photos that wee taken and never returned to the taker? And the eye-witness description, which does seem to conform more to some strange UFO rather than airplane. (Btw, not surprising that this wasn't discussed with fellow employees. Not surprising to me, actually. Maybe a bit unusual but no biggie) regarding the overall credibility. )
I don't know if the object has been falsified or not, but from MOST means of analysis, it does SEEM to be a real object in the air . One can't say for absolute certainty, but seems fare more certain than someone photographing an island, of all things, and putting it up in the sky like that. Tae latter would be a very round-about, laborious way to trick such an image.
ABSOLUTELY AND CLEARLY ABSURDLY FAKE, ABOSOLUTE RUBBISH. IT WAS FAKE THE DAY IT WAS TAKEN AND ALWAYS WILL BE.
They are here amongst us…
Dig Deeper !!!
Did they get to you too?
You solved this in the first two minutes. You do not need stories and speculation to solve this case, you are a professional photographer, all you need is the photograph and a magnifying glass.
I’d like to suggest that in the future you show continuous pictures of the subject object with you talking in the background. We don’t need to see you every minute of your narration when there is a far more interesting topic your speaking about. Looking at you does nothing to help us decide for ourselves about the photos in question.
Nah I got better ✌️😊🇦🇺
still a mystery. I am torn between fake photo or black project. or just mis information to cause a row between USA and UK? where are the photographers?
The pilot of that plane is considering coming forward.
I dont think that billions of photos needs anything but that one rare anomalous glitch. .
No different than a long drive in the car of a flight with an off refraction in the window. the more glass panes the more likely you get this perfect glare or shading. .
99% of what I've seen falls in this category beyond any doubt.
Good stuff bro keep it up
Flux Liners do not require refueling, in the standard sense.
Sorry, but the Calvine ufo photo doesn't even come close to Eduard Albert Meier's aka Billy Meier's UFO photo's, Billy Meier has 100s of day time photos of not just one but sometimes up to two, three even four UFOs or as he calls them "BEAMSHIPS" in a single photograph as well as on film and he took these pictures back in the 1970s before photoshop and computers etc. If you have never heard of Billy Meier I recommend that you go and look at his photos, videos, documentaries with witnesses and scientists as well as other various professionals that verify his footage.
That is not the original Calvin photo , it was taken between two valleys in the mountains,
,👍
It's right to observe that all airports must follow a clean area alongside airport runways without trees and buildings, but the distance from the branches of that tree in the photo and the airplane appearing in the background seems to me so far that it does not make it invalid.
Even if the photo is not a UFO I personally witnessed circle shaped object so close I could have hit it with a rock .moved quite rapidly away from me there was a friend I called upon him to view the object before it went out of sight he got a terrible fright when he seen it I was a lot more relaxed. so I know the phenomena is real👍👍👍👍👍
It really is a jet, the water is MUCH smaller, a pond w barbed fence, keep cattle slip in, the “craft” is what is leaf litter suspended by branch or twig; you’ll see it is illuminated, partly translucent. Everybody has the scale off. The men had taken shots during flights, typical jet activity in lowlands. What occurred on film is what’s called “happy accident” fake ufo. Typical small ponds are common in the area, of course, to land usage.
I've seen plenty of air fields surrounded by trees. With their fence practically covered. Also this was 50+ years ago. Regulations were more laxed. 100% believe this was taken at an airfield. Question is, which?
Best footage was the telephoto lens footage from turkey, you can see aliens, people call it hoax but no matter how good evidence is people will say hoax, I don't blame them, it's hard to accept there's other beings millions of years more evolved than us, but there is.
Sounds good I like the vid! Peace ✌️
The North of Scotland is about the same size as the Netherlands but is sparsely populated. It's a perfect area to test out new or secret craft.
Could it be a rock thrown by someone or one of those disk you throw and then shoot at
Good stuff here. I dig ur channel man 😎👍
Bs. It's a real ufo! The British air force classified this photo for decades. Then released it, when they opened there ufo files. You can see the metal it's made of. A nuts and bolts real flying saucer.
É apenas uma pequena ilha 🏝️
I do not trust the analysis that there was no photo manipulation. You duplicated the photo practically identically
It's just a flying Cybertruck
It doesn't matter whether the photo is real or not. We know they're here, too many incidents, too many sightings and encounters. And it's been covered up for over 80 years now. No more weather balloons or swamp gas….
It's an interesting photo but saying it's the best ufo photo is a stretch.